California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)

 

LEA Correspondence

LEA Communications

LEA Advisories

LEA Central

Local Enforcement Agency Correspondence

March Board Meeting Summary

Date: March 21, 2005

To: All Local Enforcement Agencies

This all LEA e-mail was sent on behalf of the LEA Support Services Branch of the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and Howard Levenson, Deputy Director Permitting and Enforcement Division.

Board Meeting: March 15, 2005

Permitting and Enforcement (P&E) Committee Meeting: March 7, 2005

Summary of the Board and P&E Committee Meetings on items of possible interest to LEAs:

  1. The Executive Director reported on four emergency waivers issued by LEAs due to the tremendous amounts of rain received in Southern California. The Riverside County LEA issued three waivers for landfills to exceed tonnages for the disposal of dairy cattle that died in the storms. San Diego County LEA issued a waiver for a landfill to extend hours to facilitate repairs for damage caused during the recent downpours.
  2. The Board and staff paid tribute to ex-member Mike Paparian for his leadership and contributions towards attaining a zero waste sustainable system in California, establishing an electronic waste management infrastructure, and promoting other waste management systems that reduce environmental impacts and add long-term environmental and economic benefits for all Californians.
  3. The Chair clarified that the two vacancies on the Board do not affect the number of votes needed for approval of issues. Four votes are still necessary for approval. As specified in PRC 44009, proposed solid waste facility permits will still need four votes for concurrence, and if the item receives only three affirmative votes, it shall be considered the same as having no action taken by the Board. It will still take four votes to object to the issuance of a permit.
  4. The Board concurred in six full solid waste facility permits; four revised permits and two new permits.
  5. The Sustainability and Market Committee heard a discussion of the results of the Electronic Survey on Barriers to C&D reuse and recycling in California. In October 2004, the survey was e-mailed to 2,433 individuals. Although the overall response rate was low, within three primary respondent groups of LEA's, private solid waste industry, and public non-regulatory agencies, the response rate was 15%. Based on the survey responses, information about the status of C&D material processing activities, and information about local jurisdiction ordinances and other programs, staff made the following findings: 1) cheaper alternatives to diversion may hinder recycling/processing; 2) there is a lack of ordinances or insufficient ordinance implementation to support C&D material diversion; 3) there is a lack of local economic incentives that support deconstruction and C&D recycling; 4) the C&D processing regulations may be too burdensome and being identified as a "solid waste handler" vs. a "recycler" creates a negative public image; 5) there is a lack of facilities to handle hard-to-process C&D materials; 6) C&D markets are lacking. Other findings include support for a statewide C&D disposal ban, a mandate to use recycled road base, placing restrictions on demolition and obtaining sufficient data on C&D reuse and recycling by local and State agencies.
  6. The Board adopted the amended Conversion Technology (CT) Report to Legislature. The report will be forwarded through Cal/EPA and the Governor’s Office to the Legislature. Assembly Bill 2770 (Matthews, Chapter 740, Statutes of 2001) required the Board to research, evaluate and submit a report to the Legislature on new and emerging non-combustion thermal, chemical, and biological technologies. The Conversion Technology Report to the Legislature recommends the following: 1) modification of definitions; 2) additional collection of data; 3) conducting research on materials flow; 4) establishment of an interagency working group to address cross-media issues; 5) recommendation for Legislature to consider some amount of diversion credit for conversion technology.
  7. The Board approved time extensions for three illegal disposal site cleanup grants issued to Merced County, Orange County, and the City of Vallejo under the Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup (AB 2136) Program. In accordance with Board policy implemented by the Grants Administrative Unit, the grant terms are normally up to three fiscal years including the year of award. Extensions are considered for approval by the Board on a case-by-case basis. The requested time extensions were needed to address unexpected delays in project completions.
  8. The P&E Committee heard a presentation and discussion of the highly praised Closed, Illegal, and Abandoned (CIA) Site Program and the site case history of the Bisso Brothers in Sonoma County. The CIA program has approximately 2,600 sites in the “closed or closing” site inventory. The CIA program not only conducts and oversees site-specific investigations, remediation and enforcement, but also provides LEAs with assistance, guidance and training and maintains the CIA site database. The Bisso site has been a very difficult but successful clean-up project on which the LEA persevered and worked with the Board to advance the remediation. The ranch was an illegal dump site from 1980s – 2001. The owner continued to illegally dispose of waste until 2001 in violation of a Court Order to cease and desist for which the owner served jail sentence for contempt of court. The site even caught fire in 1995 and the Fire Dept. was initially denied access. The remediation involved the removal 150 vehicles, 6800 tires, 4000 cubic yards of garbage, 900 tons of metal, 1750 gallons of gas/diesel fuel, and 9800 gallons of waste oil. Additionally, 20 structures were demolished and removed, 4060 cubic yards of concrete were processed for reuse, 2000 cubic yards of wood were chipped for reuse, and 10,000 cubic yards of soil were screened for reuse. Thanks to the diligence of the LEA, the site will be turned over to the Dept of Fish & Game for wetland restoration & wildlife habitat.
  9. The P&E Committee heard an update on the current status of the 33 Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) evaluations completed in the current (third) cycle through December 31, 2004. The statutory LEA evaluation mandate (PRC 43214(b)) requires the Board to evaluate LEAs at least once every three years. Currently, 55 Board-certified LEAs perform solid waste permitting, inspection, and enforcement duties throughout the state. The Board acts as the enforcement agency (EA) in six jurisdictions: the City of Berkeley, the City of Stockton, the City of Paso Robles, the County of Santa Cruz, the County of San Luis Obispo, and the County of Stanislaus. Of the 33 completed LEA evaluations: 21 LEAs were found to be fulfilling their duties and responsibilities; 5 LEAs were found to be fulfilling most of their duties and responsibilities; 7 LEAs were found to be not fulfilling all their duties and responsibilities and required a workplan in order to address their evaluation findings. Additionally, 11 more evaluations are currently at various stages of progress (including the Board as EA) and 12 LEA evaluations remain to be scheduled over the course of this third, 3-year cycle. The Board noted that the evaluation findings show that much progress has been achieved.
  10. The P&E Committee directed staff to initiate an additional 15 day comment period for the proposed regulations for long-term gas violations at permitted landfills. This rulemaking places the existing long-term gas violation policy which has allowed facility operators to revise their permits while correcting a long term gas violation into regulation. Additionally, the P&E Committee recommended that informal workshops be held to decide whether to initiate another rulemaking to amend the existing state minimum standards for gas monitoring and control at active and closed sites, as recommended in the 2004 “Landfill Compliance Study.”

The next Board meeting will be on April 19 -20, 2005 in Sacramento. The P&E Committee will meet on Monday April 11, 2005 at 10 AM.

The P&E Committee and Board meetings are being audio broadcast and are available from almost any personal computer with Internet access. Go to www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Broadcast/ or select "Broadcasts" in the upper right corner of the electronic meeting agenda.

March 15, 2005 Board Meeting: Permitting and Enforcement and Other Agenda Items

All agenda items may be accessed at: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Archive/IWMBMtgDocs/

5. Discussion. Sustainability and Market Committee Only. Disussion of Survey Regarding Barriers to Construction and Demolition Debris Reuse and Recycling

22. Discussion and Direction to Forward Report to Legislature. Discussion and Consideration of Conversion Technology Report to the Legislature

23. Approved. Consideration of Grant Agreement Time Extensions for the Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program for Merced County, Orange County, and City Of Vallejo

24. Consent. Consideration of a Revised Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Disposal Facility and Compostable Materials Handling Facility) for the Shafter-Wasco Sanitary Landfill, Kern County

25. Consent. Consideration of a New Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Compostable Materials Handling Facility) for the Engel & Gray Regional Composting Facility, Santa Barbara County

26. Consent. Consideration of a Revised Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Disposal Facility) for the City Of Lompoc-Sanitary Landfill, Santa Barbara County

27. Consent. Consideration of a Revised Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Transfer/Processing Station) for the Elder Creek Transfer Station, Sacramento County

28. Concurred. Consideration of a Revised Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Disposal Facility) for the Crazy Horse Sanitary Landfill, Monterey County

29. Consent. Consideration of a New Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Transfer/Processing Station) for the California Waste Solutions Material Recovery Facility, Santa Clara County

30. Discussion. Committee Only. Presentation and Discussion of the Closed, Illegal, and Abandoned Site Program and Bisso Brothers Site Case History (Sonoma County)

31. Discussion. Committee Only. Discussion of Local Enforcement Agency Evaluations Through December 31, 2004

32. Direction Given for Additional 15-Day Comment Period. Committee Only. Discussion and Request for Rulemaking Direction to Notice Revisions to the Proposed Regulations for Long-Term Gas Violation for an Additional 15-Day Comment Period and Request for Direction on Whether to Initiate Separate Rulemaking to Include Additional Amendments to the Existing State Minimum Standards for Gas Monitoring and Control at Active Sites

This email is not an official transcript of the Board's actions and should be used for informational purposes only.

Thank you,
Melissa Hoover-Hartwick
LEA Support Services

 


LEA Correspondence, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LEA/Mail/
Melissa Hoover-Hartwick: Melissa.Hoover-Hartwick@calrecycle.ca.gov (916) 341-6813