California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)

 

LEA Correspondence

LEA Communications

LEA Advisories

LEA Central

Local Enforcement Agency Correspondence

May Board Meeting Summary

Date: May 30, 2006

To: All Local Enforcement Agencies

Board Meeting: May 16, 2006
Permitting and Enforcement (P&E) Committee Meeting: May 8, 2006

Summary of the Board and P&E Committee Meetings on items of possible interest to LEAs:

  1. The Board heard an update on the potential for reducing landfill gas emissions (MS Power Point, 1.5 MB) to help achieve the reduction levels of greenhouse gases (GHG) specified in Executive Order S-3-05, which establishes aggressive statewide reduction targets for California. The Order charges the California Environmental Protection Agency Secretary with coordinating efforts to achieve these targets. The Order targets a reduction of GHG emissions to the levels found prior to year 2000 by 2010; a reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020; and a reduction of GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Landfill gas emissions may be around 2-4% of GHG emissions. To help reach the targeted goals, CIWMB will continue efforts to reach the 50% statewide waste reduction goal (we are at 48%); assist communities and businesses in implementing Zero Waste programs; and increase capture of methane emissions from landfills. CIWMB staff’s power point presentation to the Board on this issue discussed uncertainties in emissions estimates, current status of LFG-to-energy systems, new efforts to refine estimates, and the potential for new systems and BMPs to reduce methane emissions.
  2. The Board approved a fund reallocation and the Scope of Work (MS Word, 75 KB) to contract with the National Geographic Society for their participation in the Education and the Environment Initiative (EEI) model curriculum development, which will help to educate the public to better understand and participate in resource conservation and integrated waste management strategies. It is anticipated that the EEI will reach six million students in 1,059 school districts in California. Approximately $5.6 million dollars in consulting and professional services will be authorized over two years to complete the model curriculum and begin the training of educators for implementation of the K-12 model curriculum with its incorporated environmental principles and concepts.
  3. The Deputy Director gave an update at the Permitting and Enforcement Committee on various regulatory proposals from air districts and regional water boards on volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and potential groundwater contamination from composting facilities and on odor emissions from transfer stations and material recovery facilities (MRFs). These proposed rulemakings may have an impact on the AB 939 infrastructure.
    • Draft Waste Discharge Requirement for Green Waste Composting: The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board has a proposed a draft general Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) for green waste composting in the region. This potential general WDR initially proposed a prescribed expensive liner and monitoring requirements, which would have major implications for green waste composting and AB 939 diversion efforts in the region. Discussions are open and productive and CIWMB and the Water Board continue to work together.
    • PR 410: Last year the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) proposed a prescriptive rule to control odors at transfer stations and MRFs, that would require enclosure of existing and planned facilities in most instances. CIWMB has proposed an alternative approach in which operators would voluntarily submit odor management plans to the LEA, the LEA would enforce the design and operational aspects of the plans and work with operators to revise them as needed, and the SCAQMD would be responsible for addressing community complaints (unlike composting regulations, statutory authority for addressing odor complaints at solid waste facilities rests with local air districts rather than LEAs). SCAQMD staff has been evaluating this proposal and other comments.
    • San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Rule 4565: This rule would potentially be patterned after the SCAQMD Rule 1133 on co-composting and most likely result in requiring biofilters and enclosure of green waste composting facilities if adopted as currently proposed. So far the District is agreeable to having the results of the field studies on emissions and best management practices (BMPs) for greenwaste and foodwaste in San Diego be considered in the rulemaking process.
  4. The Deputy Director reported on the Avian Influenza (AI) preparations that were discussed at a workshop on April 27 in Fresno as part of the Homeland Security and Evaluation Program. The workshop, sponsored by the US Dept. of Homeland Security and California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), explored the implications of a highly pathogenic AI outbreak in California poultry as a result of natural events or from a terrorist attack. The workshop was intended to improve emergency response preparedness capabilities, including the possibility of the need to dispose or manage millions of dead domestic birds. Such an outbreak is possible as early as fall of 2006 and the threat could last for up to 10 years. Discussions are continuing.
  5. The Board concurred with a 4 to 2 vote, in a revised permit for a full solid waste processing facility in the County of Santa Clara. There was much discussion on whether the permit should have specified the number of vehicles allowed in addition to using the tonnage limits in the permit to monitor compliance.
  6. The Board approved commencement of the development of new Board Governance Policies (MS Word, 55 KB). At a recent workshop, the Board Members discussed ways in which they could allow Board Staff to more efficiently implement programs and allow themselves to devote more of their time and resources to handling “policy” issues and broader program objectives.
  7. Upcoming events.
    • May 31, 9 a.m.: Construction & Demolition Forum: Closing the Loop on Construction & Demolition Materials
    • May 31, 1:30 p.m.: Workshop On Board Programs
    • June 5: Public Hearing in Sacramento To Receive Comments On The Proposed Permit Implementation Regulations (AB 1497)
    • May 30-June 2 (San Diego): 2006 Cross Media Enforcement Symposium
    • May 22-25 and early June: Inspector Field Training Site Tours
    • Aug 1-3: 9th LEA/CIWMB Conference

The next Board meeting will be on June 13, 2006, in Sacramento. The P&E Committee will meet on Monday, June 5, at 10 a.m. in Sacramento.

The P&E Committee and Board meetings are audio broadcast and are available from almost any personal computer with Internet access, go to www.calrecycle.ca.gov and click on the far right link under "More Resources" titled "Broadcasts & Videos" or click on "Broadcasts" in the upper right corner of the electronic meeting agenda.

May 16, 2006 Board Meeting: Permitting and Enforcement and Other Agenda Items

All agenda items may be accessed at: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Archive/IWMBMtgDocs/

16. Discussion. Overview and Discussion of Landfill Gas in Relation to Climate Change

17. Pulled. Consideration of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Transfer/Processing Station) for the Western Amador Recycling Facility, Amador County

18. Pulled. Consideration of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Compostable Materials Handling Facility) for Cranford Inc., Monterey County

19. Concurred. Consideration of a Revised Full Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Disposal Facility/Transfer/Processing Station/Compostable Materials Handling Facility) for the Zanker Road Resource Recovery Operation And Landfill, Santa Clara County

20. Pulled. Consideration of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit (Transfer/Processing Station) for American Waste Industries, City Of Los Angeles

21. Discussion. Consideration of Reallocation, Scope Of Work, and the National Geographic Society as Contractor for the Development of Environmental Educational Materials in Furtherance of the Education in the Environment Initiative (Integrated Waste Management Account, FYs 2005/06 and 2006/07)

24. Discussion. Consideration of Commencing the Development and Adoption of Board Governance Policies

 


LEA Correspondence, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LEA/Mail/
Melissa Hoover-Hartwick: Melissa.Hoover-Hartwick@calrecycle.ca.gov (916) 341-6813